Ensemble Kalman filter data assimilation for a process‐based catchment scale model of surface and subsurface flow
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A sequential data assimilation procedure based on the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) is introduced and tested for a process‐based numerical model of coupled surface and subsurface flow. The model is based on the three‐dimensional Richards equation for variably saturated porous media and a diffusion wave approximation for overland and channel flow. A one‐dimensional soil column experiment and a three‐dimensional tilted v‐catchment test case are presented. A preliminary analysis of the assimilation scheme is undertaken for the one‐dimensional test case in order to validate the implementation by comparison with published results and to assess the influence of various factors on the filter's performance. The numerical results suggest robustness with respect to the ensemble size and provide useful information for the more complex tilted v‐catchment test case. The assimilation frequency and the effects induced by data assimilation on the surface and/or subsurface system states are then evaluated for the v‐catchment experiment using synthetic observations of pressure head and streamflow. The results suggest that streamflow prediction can be improved by assimilation of pressure head and streamflow, either individually or in tandem, whereas assimilation of streamflow data alone does not improve the subsurface system state. In terms of the global system state, i.e., surface and subsurface variables, frequent updates are especially beneficial when assimilating both pressure head and streamflow. Furthermore, it is shown that better evaluation of the subsurface volume resulting from assimilation of head data is crucial for improving subsequent surface response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".