MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1526017189 · doi:10.1136/bmj.c2178

Recurrence of hyperemesis across generations

2010· letter· en· W1526017189 on OpenAlexaff
Catherine Nelson‐Piercy

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ · 2010
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and Medication Impact
Canadian institutionsWomen's Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRandomized controlled trialPsychological interventionGerontologyFall preventionPediatricsPoison controlSuicide preventionPsychiatryInternal medicineEmergency medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1 Campbell Aj, Robertson MC. Implementation of multifactorial interventions for fall and fracture prevention. Age Ageing 2006;35:60-4. 2 Sherrington C, Whitney JC, Lord SR, Herbert RD, Cumming RG, Close JCT. Effective exercise forthe prevention of falls: a systematic review and meta-analysis..Mm GeriatrSoc 2008;56:2234-43. 3 Clemson L, Mackenzie L, Ballinger C, Close JCT, Cumming RG. Environmental interventions to prevent falls in community-dwelling older people a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Aging Health 2008;20:954-71. 4 Pit SW, Byles JE, Henry DA, Holt L, Hansen V, Bowman DA. A quality use of medicines program for general practitioners and older people: a cluster randomised controlled trial. MedJAust 2007; 187:23-30. 5 Logan PA, Coupland CAC, Gladman JRF, Sahota 0, Stoner-Hobbs V, Robertson K, et al. Community falls prevention for people who call an emergency ambulance after a fall: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2010;340:c2102. 6 Close J, Ellis M, Hooper R, Glucksman E, Jackson S, Swift C. Prevention of falls in the elderly trial (PROFET): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1999;353:93-7. 7 Davison J, Bond J, Dawson P, Steen IN, Kenny RA, Davison J, et al. Patients with recurrent falls attending accident & emergency benefit from multifactorial intervention: a randomised controlled trial. Age Ageing 2005;34:162-8. 8 Whitehead C, Wundke R, Crotty M, Finucane P. Evidence-based clinical practice in falls prevention: a randomised controlled trial of a falls prevention service. Aust Health /?ev2003;26:88-97. 9 Lightbody E, Watkins C, Leathley M, Sharma A, Lye M. Evaluation of a nurse-led falls prevention programme versus usual care: a randomized controlled trial. Age Ageing 2002;31:203-10. 10 Gates S, Fisher JD, Cooke MW, Carter YH, Lamb SE. Multifactorial assessment and targeted intervention for preventing falls and injuries among older people in community and emergency care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis. s/Wy2008;336:l 30-3. 11 Gruen RL, Elliot JH, Nolan M, Lawton PD, Parkhill A, McLaren CJ, et al. Sustainability science: an integrated approach for health-programme planning. ?ancef2008;372:l 579-89. 1 2 Ganz D, Yano EM, Salibal D, Shekelle P. Design of a continuous quality improvement program to prevent falls among community-dwelling older ■ adults in an integrated healthcare system. BMC Health Sen/ Res 2009. www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/206.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJSame topicPregnancy and Medication ImpactFrench-language works237,207