MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Social and Spiritual Capital at Work through a Ministry of Hospitality

2013· article· en· W1526092787 on OpenAlexaffabout
Geoff Peddle, Jolene Peters

Bibliographic record

VenueRural Theology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion, Society, and Development
Canadian institutionsAcadia UniversityGovernment of Newfoundland and LabradorMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHospitalityChristian ministrySocial capitalContext (archaeology)Work (physics)SociologyPublic relationsFocus groupManagementPsychologyPolitical scienceSocial scienceTourismLawEngineeringGeographyEconomicsAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper employs social and spiritual capital theory to explore the development and success of a ministry of hospitality exercised in the context of rural parish ministry in Newfoundland. The theory is explored through a series of three focus groups, two conducted with guests and one with the volunteers who operate the ministry. The data support the hypothesis that both guests and volunteers receive social and spiritual benefits from their engagement with this ministry of hospitality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.451
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRural TheologySame topicReligion, Society, and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207