Effets d’un dispositif d’accompagnement sur la construction identitaire des enseignants du secondaire
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Confrontés aux multiples changements survenus en éducation, les enseignants doivent s’adapter à la diversité des profils d’apprenants désormais intégrés en classe régulière. Notre étude porte sur un dispositif d’accompagnement en deux volets (en groupe et individuel) visant à soutenir le développement professionnel des enseignants du secondaire. La création d’espaces dialogiques a stimulé les échanges, le partage et la confrontation des idées et des valeurs dans le but que se construisent de nouveaux repères qui guident le travail. Les résultats obtenus montrent que le soutien offert a favorisé l’adoption de pratiques orientées vers les principes de l’éducation inclusive et a permis de développer une vision commune au sein de l’équipe-école.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it