MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1526179887 · doi:10.3968/4961

The Study on the Curriculum Setting and Characteristics of Cambridge Undergraduate Philosophy Major

2014· article· en· W1526179887 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in sociology of science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFlannery O'Connor and Thomas Merton
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumPhilosophy educationPhilosophy of educationPhilosophy of Education Society of Great BritainPhilosophy of sportPhilosophy of computer scienceSociologyTeaching philosophyWestern philosophyProcess (computing)Engineering ethicsPedagogyPhilosophy of mathematics educationHigher educationMathematics educationPsychologySocial scienceEpistemologyPhilosophyPolitical scienceEngineeringComputer scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Education of philosophy is both an old and new topic. It is an important approach for human thoughts propagation and theoretical studies. At theUniversityofCambridge, philosophy teaching and learning activities have been existed for 804 years, born at the same time with the university. . This thesis aims to examine the developmental process  of philosophy education at the undergraduate level,, to  investigate the curriculum of philosophy education of the latest ten years, and to summarize the characteristics of philosophy education  at the University of Cambridge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.411
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.013
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it