MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1526262556

Taquicardia sinusal inapropiada: actualización

2007· article· es· W1526262556 on OpenAlexaff
Carlos A. Morillo, Juan C. Guzmán

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Española de Cardiología · 2007
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHumanities
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La taquicardia sinusal inapropiada (TSI) es una arritmia rara que se caracteriza por un incremento exagerado en la frecuencia cardiaca asociado con demandas fisiologicas comunes. Generalmente, la TSI se inicia por cambios posicionales, ejercicio minimo y estres psicologico. La etiologia de la TSI no esta completamente esclarecida. Sin embargo, algunos de los mecanismos propuestos incluyen: aumento del automatismo del nodulo sinusal, alteraciones en la funcion autonomica mediadas por un incremento en la actividad simpatica o una disminucion de la actividad parasimpatica, y anormalidades en el control barorreflejo. Recientemente se ha observado un aumento de autoanticuerpos betaadrenergicos en pacientes con TSI. La presentacion clinica de la TSI es variada: desde episodios cortos de palpitaciones asociadas con disnea, dolor precordial atipico, cefalea, fatiga y ocasionalmente sincope y presincope hasta la taquicardia incesante incapacitante. La TSI se diagnostica por exclusion. Es necesario descartar otras causas de taquicardia sinusal antes de establecer el diagnostico. La evaluacion de la funcion autonomica es indispensable para el diagnostico de la TSI. El tratamiento de la TSI esta basado en los hallazgos autonomicos y una atencion multidisciplinaria en la que se incluye la rehabilitacion cardiaca. El control y la restitucion de la funcion autonomica son indispensables. El pronostico es benigno y se requiere un seguimiento periodico para ajustar la terapia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.758
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Española de CardiologíaSame topicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersFrench-language works237,207