MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1526279039

Evolution of the forest cover in Cote d'Ivoire since 1960 to the beginning of the 21st century

2014· article· en· W1526279039 on OpenAlexaff
Moussa Koné, Yao Lambert Kouadio, Danho Fursy Rodelec Neuba, Djah François Malan, Lacina Coulibaly

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational journal of innovation and applied studies · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAfrican Botany and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeforestation (computer science)GeographyLand coverForest coverLoggingCote d ivoireForestryPhysical geographySatellite imageryAgroforestryVegetation (pathology)Forest fragmentationLand useEnvironmental scienceRemote sensingEcologyBiodiversity
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deforestation is a phenomenon that is a reality in Cote d'Ivoire. Thus, this study aims to determine the spatio- temporal evolution of her moist forests. For the 1960s, the moist forest cover of the country is determined through the vegetation mapping by digitizing. Those of decades 1980 and 2000 are obtained by treatment of Landsat TM and ETM+ satellite images. Supervised classification by maximum likelihood allowed getting maps of the land with, cartographic accuracy greater than 90%. Of these maps, the class of moist forests was extracted and converted to vector data format. The intersection of moist forests of decades 1980 and 2000 with those of the 1960s was used to determine their specific characterization. The results show a moist forest cover of about 8.14 million ha for 1960s with the presence of large blocks. The 1980s and 2000s have respectively forest cover of about 2.6 million ha and 1.35 million ha. These periods are characterized by high fragmentation and loss of rain forests in Cote d'Ivoire. Thus, since its independence, the country has lost more than 80% of its forest cover. Agricultural clearings related to demographic pressure and logging are the main causes of deforestation in Cote d'Ivoire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.324
Threshold uncertainty score0.109

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational journal of innovation and applied studiesSame topicAfrican Botany and Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207