Epigenetic specification of centromeresThis paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue, entitled 29th Annual International Asilomar Chromatin and Chromosomes Conference, and has undergone the Journal’s usual peer review process.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Centromeres are the discrete sites of spindle microtubule attachment on chromosomes during mitosis and meiosis in all eukaryotes. These highly specialized chromatin structures typically occupy the same site for thousands of generations, yet the mechanism by which centromeres are established, maintained, and function remain a mystery. In metazoans, centromeric DNA sequence has proven not to be the key determinant of centromeric identity; therefore, centromeres are thought to be epigenetically specified by their specialized chromatin structure. In all eukaryotes, the centromere-specific histone H3 variant CenH3 replaces canonical H3 within nucleosomes at centric chromatin. This specialized nucleosome is the building block upon which all other centromere-associated proteins depend. This review highlights exciting new findings that have resulted in a paradigm shift in our understanding of CenH3 assembly into centromeric chromatin, CenH3 nucleosomal structure, CenH3 chromatin folding, the contribution of these factors to centromeric identity, and finally, the intimate role cell-cycle-regulated transcription and pericentric heterochromatin play in the maintenance and integrity of centromeres.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".