Frequent Occurrence of Precocious Flowering in Zygotic Seedlings Derived from Crosses with a Monoembryonic and Male Sterile Acid Citrus Hybrid between Yuzu (C. junos Sieb. ex Tanaka) and Hanayu (C.hanaju Hort.exShirai)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We successfully produced a male sterile and monoembryonic acid citrus hybrid plant that generated seedlings showing precocious flowering with high rates. Of 26 crosses with 16 acid citrus cultivars, three ('Sudachi'*'Yuzu', 'Hanayu'*'Kabosu' and 'Hanayu'*'Yuzu') were firstly found to generate precociously flowered seedlings with low rates. Second, 23 bybrid seedlings with 'Hanayu', 'Kabosu' and 'Sudachi' in their parents were crossed with 'Hanayu', 'Kabosu' and 'Yuzu', and then the cross (HY-16*'Yuzu') was found to generate precocious seedlings with a high rate of 6%. When the hybrid plant HY-16 derived from 'Hanayu'*'Yuzu' was crossed with 'Yuzu' in different years, it constantly generated seedlings showing precocious flowering with a rate of 6%, but it did not genetate them when it was crossed with 'Hanayu'. When HY-16 was crossed with grapefluit cultivars, it generated seedlings exhibiting precocious flowering with very high rates of anout 15%. The seedlings derived from 'Hanayu'*'Yuzu' and selfing of 'Hanayu' and 'Yuzu' genetated seedlings showing precocious flowering with low rates of about 1%. HY-16 was a male sterile and monoembryonic plant with fruitful and seedy characters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".