Thorstein Veblen : un auteur en filigrane en sociologie des pratiques sportives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Si la présence de Veblen dans les travaux sociologiques et les manuels en Sciences et Techniques des Activités Physiques et Sportives se fait objectivement très discrète, cette dernière sourd pourtant de plusieurs écrits. Tel un symbole, il y est présent en filigrane. L’acteur sportif y est présenté comme une expression magnifiée de l’acteur économique veblenien. Le consommateur de loisirs sportifs contemporain se cherche entre son "instinct du travail efficient" et son désir de "consommation ostentatoire". Prenant appui sur de multiples recherches issues de la littérature scientifique francophone, ce travail pose ensuite la question d’une "classe de loisir" généralisée ou perdurante comme hypothèse essentielle de l’actualité du travail de Veblen. Enfin, cette étude se conclue par la question du rapport des chercheurs en sociologie du sport aux modèles théoriques, lequel souscrit largement aux attendus de prudence et de recherches de terrain que développait Veblen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".