MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1526652499 · doi:10.1002/9781444345100.ch93

Initial Management of the Sports Injured Knee

2011· other· en· W1526652499 on OpenAlexaff
Jaskarndip Chahal, Christopher Peskun, Daniel B. Whelan

Bibliographic record

VenueEvidence-Based Orthopedics · 2011
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicKnee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHemarthrosisMedicineAnterior cruciate ligamentTearsArthroscopyMeniscusLachman testSurgeryLigamentMagnetic resonance imagingMedial collateral ligamentPhysical therapyRadiologyAnterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our literature review suggests that the most common causes of an acute hemarthrosis in the sports injured knee is an injury to the anterior cruciate ligament followed by meniscus tears and medial collateral ligament injury. The Lachman test is the most sensitive clinical maneuver to diagnose an ACL tear while the pivot-shift test is the most specific. Arthroscopy is not recommended as a diagnostic tool in favor of magnetic resonance imaging in order to avoid unnecessary surgical procedures. While the literature has not demonstrated functional or clinical differences following acute reconstruction of the ACL, a well designed level one study is required before this can be routinely advocated. Additionally, the available literature can neither recommend nor discourage the use of aspiration for symptomatic relief or functional improvement in the acutely injured knee with hemarthrosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEvidence-Based OrthopedicsSame topicKnee injuries and reconstruction techniquesFrench-language works237,207