Soybean peroxidase trapped in product precipitate during phenol polymerization retains activity and may be recycled
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract BACKGROUND Studies with peroxidase (EC 1.11.1.7) have demonstrated that phenolic precipitate adsorbs free enzyme, inactivating it. The end‐product inactivation model has been proposed to explain the effect. Additives, such as polyethylene glycol and Triton X‐100, were reported to effectively extend enzyme lifetime by preventing the adsorption. RESULTS It was found that soybean peroxidase (SBP, EC 1.11.1.7) trapped in precipitate during phenol polymerization retains activity. Contrary to the end‐product inactivation model, recycling precipitate effectively utilized the active SBP. The minimum SBP concentration required for the subsequent batch reaction removal of 1 mmol L‐1 phenol from aqueous solution was reduced from 1.2 to 0.5 U mL‐1. SBP adsorption on the precipitate was proven to be reversible by the addition of Triton X‐100. Thus, a new explanation of SBP fate during the reaction is suggested: SBP is immobilized in situ in an active form with reduction of specific activity rather than inactivation. The adsorption is characterized by a Langmuir isotherm. CONCLUSIONS The phenolic precipitate immobilizes SBP in an active form, consistent with the Langmuir isotherm model. Recycling the precipitate improves the enzyme economy in phenol removal. © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".