MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1526965806 · doi:10.1109/lcn.1990.128672

Performance of the Xpress transfer protocol in an Ethernet environment

2002· article· en· W1526965806 on OpenAlexafffund
J.X.G. Chen, J. William Atwood

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersConcordia University
KeywordsFiber Distributed Data InterfaceEthernetComputer scienceComputer networkNetwork packetLocal area networkProtocol (science)Overhead (engineering)ATA over EthernetTransfer (computing)ThroughputOperating systemEthernet flow control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A simulation analysis is presented of the performance of the Xpress transfer protocol (XTP), a high-speed protocol intended for fiber distributed data interface (FDDI) or Ethernet environments. The local area network simulation facility (LANSF) is modified to support virtual circuit simulation, and then used to obtain the XTP performance statistics. The chosen simulation LAN environment is Ethernet. The analysis of XTP shows that it can provide high throughput to transport users for bulk data movement operations such as file transfer. Its bandwidth for short transfers is limited by the necessity of carrying the overhead of packet headers, packet trailers, and acknowledgment packets. However, it is not worse than most other protocols in this respect.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDistributed and Parallel Computing SystemsFrench-language works237,207