The classification of Blandin de Cornouailles: the romance within and without
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The romance of Blandin de Cornouailles is one of the very few works in Provencal with a narrative form of octosyllabic rhyming couplets. It has thus been considered to belong to the general genre of roman courtois. A study by Jacques de Caluwe has attempted to categorise it further as a parody of that genre because of some of the convolutions of the plot (de Caluwe 63). A more recent work by Jean-Charles Huchet has called into question the appropriateness of the term roman and, in speaking of the author of Flamenca, remarks: il appellera roman...ce qu'on considererait plus volontiers comme un conte ou une nouvelle (Huchet 30). Generic identity is not secure and Huchet points out that the authors of both Jaufre and Flamenca refer to their works as novas (31). Given this change in nomenclature, one might ask: to what extent is this work a romance?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".