Transition asymptotics for reaction-diffusion in random media
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We describe a universal transition mechanism characterizing the passage to an annealed behavior and to a regime where the fluctuations about this behavior are Gaussian, for the long time asymptotics of the empirical average of the expected value of the number of random walks which branch and annihilate on ${\mathbb Z}^d$, with stationary random rates. The random walks are independent, continuous time rate $2dκ$, simple, symmetric, with $κ\ge 0$. A random walk at $x\in{\mathbb Z}^d$, binary branches at rate $v_+(x)$, and annihilates at rate $v_-(x)$. The random environment $w$ has coordinates $w(x)=(v_-(x),v_+(x))$ which are i.i.d. We identify a natural way to describe the annealed-Gaussian transition mechanism under mild conditions on the rates. Indeed, we introduce the exponents $F_θ(t):=\frac{H_1((1+θ)t)-(1+θ)H_1(t)}θ$, and assume that $\frac{F_{2θ}(t)-F_θ(t)}{θ\log(κt+e)}\to\infty$ for $|θ|>0$ small enough, where $H_1(t):=\log < m(0,t)>$ and $$ denotes the average of the expected value of the number of particles $m(0,t,w)$ at time $t$ and an environment of rates $w$, given that initially there was only one particle at 0. Then the empirical average of $m(x,t,w)$ over a box of side $L(t)$ has different behaviors: if $ L(t)\ge e^{\frac{1}{d} F_ε(t)}$ for some $ε>0$ and large enough $t$, a law of large numbers is satisfied; if $ L(t)\ge e^{\frac{1}{d} F_ε(2t)}$ for some $ε>0$ and large enough $t$, a CLT is satisfied. These statements are violated if the reversed inequalities are satisfied for some negative $ε$. Applications to potentials with Weibull, Frechet and double exponential tails are given.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".