MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1527371219 · doi:10.1071/rdv16n1ab11

11 THE EFFECT OF PRESYNCHRONIZATION ON PREGNANCY RATE TO FIXED-TIME AI IN BEEF HEIFERS SUBJECTED TO A COSYNCH PROTOCOL

2004· article· en· W1527371219 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstrous cycleAnimal scienceFolliclePregnancy ratePregnancyBeef cattleUltrasonographyMedicineCloprostenolAndrologyInternal medicineOvulationBiologyHormoneSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective was to investigate the effect of presynchronization with PGF prior to a Cosynch protocol on estrus synchrony, CL and preovulatory follicle diameters and pregnancy rate following timed-AI (TAI) in beef heifers. Cycling beef heifers (n = 148) were treated with 100 µg GnRH i.m. (Cystorelin, Merial Canada Inc., Victoriaville, Quebec, Canada) on Day 0, 500 µg cloprostenol i.m. (PGF; Estrumate, Schering Plough Animal Health, Pointe-Claire, Quebec, Canada) on Day 7, and GnRH concurrent with TAI on Day 9 (54 h after PGF). Half of the heifers (Control) received the first GnRH treatment at random stages of the estrous cycle, while the other half (Presynch) received two injections of PGF 11 days apart, with the first injection of GnRH 11 days after the second injection of PGF. Estrus detection was done between the first GnRH and 12 h after PGF, and heifers detected in estrus were inseminated (and considered nonpregnant to TAI), while all other heifers were TAI. Heifers were examined by transrectal ultrasonography for CL and follicle development, and confirmation of pregnancy. Data were compared between groups using Student’s t-test and chi-square procedures. The numbers of heifers in estrus early (after first GnRH and before TAI) was higher in the Control group than in the Presynch group (18/74 v. 2/74, respectively; P < 0.0001). Mean (±SD) diameters of the dominant follicle (12.1 ± 3.1 v. 14.2 ± 2.5 mm) and CL (17.3 ± 5.5 v. 20.5 ± 4.3 mm) at first GnRH injection were smaller (P < 0.0001) and more variable (P < 0.03) in Control than Presynch heifers, but diameters of the preovulatory follicle (P = 0.3) and CL (P = 0.1) at TAI did not differ. Although the diameter of the preovulatory follicle was more variable (P < 0.004) in Control (5 to 19 mm) than Presynch (8 to 17 mm) heifers, pregnancy rate to TAI did not differ (P = 0.4; 29.7 v. 36.5%, respectively). Overall pregnancy rates were 45.9 and 37.8% for Control and Presynch groups, respectively (P = 0.3). Pregnancy rate tended (P < 0.08) to be affected by diameter of the preovulatory follicle at the time of TAI (0, 23.1, 45.7, 41.4, and 60.0% pregnant for diameters of < 9, 9–11, 12–14, 15–17, and > 17 mm, respectively). Regardless of treatment, diameter of the preovulatory dominant follicle (P < 0.02) and CL (P < 0.03) 7 days after TAI was smaller, and CL diameter was more variable (P < 0.004), in open than in pregnant heifers (12.7 ± 2.6 v. 13.8 ± 2.1 mm, and 16.5 ± 4.4 v. 18.0 ± 3.0 mm, respectively). In summary, presynchronization with PGF prior to a Cosynch protocol reduced the proportion of heifers in estrus before TAI, suggesting that this approach may be useful in the successful application of Ovsynch or Cosynch programs in heifers. However, pregnancy rate to TAI did not differ between groups in this study. Diameter of the preovulatory follicle tended to positively affect pregnancy rate, regardless of treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.692
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it