Atrincheramientos y balbuceos neotribales: el grupo poético "Neón" entre la violencia utópica senderista y la dictadura neoliberal fujimorista. El caso de Carlos Oliva
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lo que nos proponemos en el presente trabajo es una visión comprensiva de una agrupación de jóvenes poetas que, desde nuestra óptica, puede ser considerada, en el Perú de inicios de la década del noventa, como la organización de este tipo de mayor actividad y presencia: Neón. Nuestro propósito es acercarnos a este grupo desde una lectura que lo interprete en función del complejo momento social en el que se desenvolvió. Como una primera aproximación, y a modo de ejemplificación literaria, centraremos esta lectura en el análisis de un poema de uno de sus fundadores: Carlos Oliva (Lima 1960-1994). A diez años de su muerte, queremos dedicar este texto como un homenaje al poeta asesinado (al final del ensayo se apreciará el estricto sentido de esta última palabra). Para desarrollar nuestro objetivo usaremos fundamentalmente como sustento teórico una reflexión de Martín Hopenhayn
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".