Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les études en histoire urbaine traitant de la haine de la ville, des discours et des pratiques qui s’en inspirent, se multiplient depuis une dizaine d’années, mais ont eu peu d’échos au Québec. Pourtant, une étude des discours catholiques québécois traitant de la ville et du fait urbain durant l’entre-deux-guerres permet non seulement de faire ressortir leurs caractéristiques au moment où la majorité de la population de la province devient citadine, mais aussi d’identifier les traits qui les distinguent de ceux que l’on observe ailleurs dans le monde catholique au même moment. Il y a, d’une part, la centralité du cas montréalais, qui incarne à lui seul toutes les tares du monde urbain aux yeux des catholiques canadiens-français et, d’autre part, la façon dont l’urbanité est associée non seulement à l’irréligion, mais à l’Autre anglophone et protestant. Généralement hostiles, ces discours laissent tout de même transparaître de timides signes d’une volonté d’apprivoiser ou de s’approprier une certaine urbanité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".