MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1528320343 · doi:10.5772/23753

Numerical Simulation of Pneumatic and Cyclonic Dryers Using Computational Fluid Dynamics

2011· book-chapter· en· W1528320343 on OpenAlexaff
Jabed Hasan Tarek, B. Madhumita

Bibliographic record

VenueInTech eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGranular flow and fluidized beds
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcess engineeringPelletizingRaw materialProcess (computing)Spray dryingEnvironmental scienceEngineeringComputer scienceMaterials scienceChemistryPelletsChemical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drying is inherently a cross and multidisciplinary area because it requires optimal fusion of transport phenomena and materials science and the objective of drying is not only to supply heat and remove moisture from the material but to produce a dehydrated product of specific quality (Mujumdar, 2004) [1] . There are two main modes of drying used in the heat drying or pelletization processes; namely, direct and indirect modes. Each mode of drying has its merits and disadvantages and the choice of dryer design and drying method varies according to the nature of the material to be handled, the final form of the product, and the operating and capital cost of the drying process. The drying of various materials at different conditions in a wide variety of industrial and technological applications is a necessary step either to obtain products that serve our daily needs or to facilitate and enhance some of the chemical reactions conducted in many engineering processes. Drying processes consume large amounts of energy; any improvement in existing dryer design and reduction in operating cost will be immensely beneficial for the industry. With the advance in technology and the high demands for large quantities of various industrial products, innovative drying technologies and sophisticated drying equipment are emerging and many of them remain to be in a developmental stage due to the ever increasing presence of new feedstock and wetted industrial products. During the past few decades, considerable efforts have been made to understand some of the chemical and physical changes that occur during the drying operation and to develop new methods for preventing undesirable quality losses. It is estimated that nearly 250 U.S. patents and 80 European patents related to drying are issued each year (Mujumdar, 2004) [1] . Currently, the method of drying does not end at the food processing industry but extends to a broad range of applications in the chemical, biochemical, pharmaceutical, and agricultural sectors. In a paper by Mujumdar and Wu (2008) The collective effort of their research work along with other researchers in the drying industry using mathematical www.intechopen.com

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInTech eBooksSame topicGranular flow and fluidized bedsFrench-language works237,207