MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1528349268 · doi:10.1109/isic.1991.187405

Telerobotics for space station Freedom

2002· article· en· W1528349268 on OpenAlexfundno aff
S. Kalaycioglu, S. Seifu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTeleoperation and Haptic Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsTeleroboticsSoftware deploymentSpace Station FreedomSystems engineeringPlan (archaeology)Space ShuttleTask (project management)Computer scienceMobile robotRobotAutonomous system (mathematics)NASA Deep Space NetworkSpace (punctuation)EngineeringArtificial intelligenceSoftware engineeringSpacecraftAerospace engineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A discussion is presented of work in progress to define and plan the development of technologies required to provide a supervised autonomous operation (telerobotics) capability for the special purpose dexterous manipulator (SPDM) on the mobile servicing system. A telerobotics system concept is introduced, and a summary of the system requirements is given. The development methodology and the concept for a supervised autonomous robot (telerobotics) are briefly explained. The functional and physical architectures of the telerobotics system are also provided. This system will be responsible for carrying out operations such as assembly and maintenance of the US space station Freedom; loading/unloading from the shuttle; and retrieval and deployment of the shuttle, etc. The work also investigates a strawman task (operational scenario) for maintenance of the space station Freedom and briefly describes the operational scenario for changing an orbital replacement unit on the mobile servicing system.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.460

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTeleoperation and Haptic SystemsFrench-language works237,207