MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1528392720 · doi:10.4000/pallas.187

La mer pourpre : façons grecques de voir en couleurs. Représentations littéraires du chromatisme marin à l’époque archaïque

2013· article· fr· W1528392720 on OpenAlex
Adeline Grand‐Clément

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePallas · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMaritime and Coastal Archaeology
Canadian institutionsCanadian Heritage
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pourquoi, chez Homère et dans le reste de la littérature préclassique, la mer arbore-t-elle de multiples couleurs (noir, blanc, gris, violet, pourpre,..), sans être jamais bleue ? La réponse à cette question n’est pas à chercher dans un quelconque problème de déficience visuelle, mais bien plutôt dans la nature du regard que les Grecs de l’époque archaïque portaient sur l’étendue marine. En abordant la question philologique par le biais de l’anthropologie historique, on découvre alors que les incohérences et étrangetés apparentes du lexique chromatique grec s’évanouissent. L’article cherche ainsi à montrer que l’analyse des représentations du chromatisme marin dans la littérature archaïque permet de décentrer notre regard et de mettre en lumière la nature des sentiments suscités par la toute puissance de la mer dans l’imaginaire collectif grec.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.647
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it