Micro-computed tomography–based highly automated 3D segmentation of the rat spine for quantitative analysis of metastatic disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Noninvasive evaluation of metastatic disease in the spine has generally been limited to 2D qualitative or semiquantitative analysis techniques. This study aims to develop and evaluate a highly automated micro-CT-based quantitative analysis tool that can measure the architectural impact of metastatic involvement in whole vertebrae. Micro-CT analysis of rat whole vertebrae was conducted using a combination of demons deformable registration, level set curvature evolution, and intensity based thresholding techniques along with upsampling and edge enhancement techniques. The algorithm was applied to 6 lumbar vertebrae (L1-3) from 6 rnu/rnu rats (3 healthy rats and 3 with metastatic involvement). Osteolytic metastatic involvement was modeled via MT1 human breast cancer cells. Excellent volumetric concurrency was achieved in comparing the automated micro-CT-based segmentations of the whole vertebrae, trabecular centrums, and individual trabecular networks to manual segmentations (98.9%, 96.1%, and 98.3%, respectively; 6 specimens), and the automated segmentations were achieved in a fraction of the time. The algorithm successfully accounted for discontinuities in the cortical shell caused by vasculature and osteolytic destruction. As such, this work demonstrates the potential of this highly automated segmentation tool to permit rapid precise quantitative structural analysis of the spine with minimum user interaction in the analysis of both healthy and pathological (metastatically involved) vertebrae. Future optimization and the incorporation of lower-resolution imaging parameters may allow automated analysis of clinical CT-based measures in addition to preclinical micro-CT-based analyses of the structural impact and progression of pathological processes in the spine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".