MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1528411120 · doi:10.3171/2010.3.spine09576

Micro-computed tomography–based highly automated 3D segmentation of the rat spine for quantitative analysis of metastatic disease

2010· article· en· W1528411120 on OpenAlexaff
Seyed‐Parsa Hojjat, Michael Hardisty, Cari Whyne

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurosurgery Spine · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSegmentationThresholdingRadiologyArtificial intelligenceNuclear medicineBiomedical engineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Noninvasive evaluation of metastatic disease in the spine has generally been limited to 2D qualitative or semiquantitative analysis techniques. This study aims to develop and evaluate a highly automated micro-CT-based quantitative analysis tool that can measure the architectural impact of metastatic involvement in whole vertebrae. Micro-CT analysis of rat whole vertebrae was conducted using a combination of demons deformable registration, level set curvature evolution, and intensity based thresholding techniques along with upsampling and edge enhancement techniques. The algorithm was applied to 6 lumbar vertebrae (L1-3) from 6 rnu/rnu rats (3 healthy rats and 3 with metastatic involvement). Osteolytic metastatic involvement was modeled via MT1 human breast cancer cells. Excellent volumetric concurrency was achieved in comparing the automated micro-CT-based segmentations of the whole vertebrae, trabecular centrums, and individual trabecular networks to manual segmentations (98.9%, 96.1%, and 98.3%, respectively; 6 specimens), and the automated segmentations were achieved in a fraction of the time. The algorithm successfully accounted for discontinuities in the cortical shell caused by vasculature and osteolytic destruction. As such, this work demonstrates the potential of this highly automated segmentation tool to permit rapid precise quantitative structural analysis of the spine with minimum user interaction in the analysis of both healthy and pathological (metastatically involved) vertebrae. Future optimization and the incorporation of lower-resolution imaging parameters may allow automated analysis of clinical CT-based measures in addition to preclinical micro-CT-based analyses of the structural impact and progression of pathological processes in the spine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.635
Threshold uncertainty score0.330

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurosurgery SpineSame topicMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207