MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1528474120

Extending the Capability of the Complex Effective Depth Approximation

2012· article· en· W1528474120 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
David J. Thomson, Gary H. Brooke

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScatteringContext (archaeology)Boundary value problemSurface (topology)WaveguideWaves and shallow waterBoundary (topology)Mode (computer interface)Class (philosophy)Wave propagationShallow water equationsMathematical analysisGeologyAcousticsComputer scienceMathematicsGeometryOpticsPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we extend the effective-depth method to include two boundary features that can effect propagation in shallow water. First, we show how the coherent scattering effects due to a rough sea-surface can be accommodated within the context of the Kirchhoff approximation. Second, we demonstrate how the basic equations can be readily modified to take into account a layered ocean bottom structure. As a result, the complex effective-depth approach can be applied without difficulty to a more general class of shallow water propagation environments. Following a brief summary of the necessary equations and iteration algorithm, we present an example that exhibits the effects on normal mode propagation for a Pekeris type waveguide having a layered ocean bottom and a rough surface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian acousticsSame topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207