MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1528547029 · doi:10.2307/4146165

Charity, Philanthropy, and Civility in American History

2005· article· en· W1528547029 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Soma Hewa, Lawrence J. Friedman, Mark Douglas McGarvie

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Sociology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion, Society, and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCivilitySociologyPolitical scienceLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: philanthropy in America: historicism and its discontents Lawrence J. Friedman Part I. Giving and Caring in Early America, 1601-1861: 1. Giving in America: from charity to organised philanthropy Robert Gross 2. Protestant missionaries: pioneers of early American philanthropy Amanda Porterfield 3. The origins of Anglo-American sensibility G. J. Barker Benfield 4. The Dartmouth College case and the legal design of American philanthropy Mark McGarvie 5. Rethinking assimilation: American Indians and the practice of Christianity, 1800-1861 Stephen Warren 6. Antebellum reform: salvation, self-control, and social transformation Wendy Gamber Part II. The Nationalisation and Internationalising of American Philanthropy, 1861-1930: 7. Law, reconstruction, and African-American education in post-emancipation South Foy Finkenbine 8. Women and political culture Kathleen McCarthy 9. From gift to foundation: the philanthropic lives of Mrs Russell Sage Ruth Crocker 10. 'Curing evils at their source': the arrival of 'scientific giving' Judy Sealander 11. Missions to the world: philanthropy abroad Emily Rosenberg Part III. Philanthropic Reconstructions, 1930-2001: 12. Failure and resilience: pushing the limits in depression and wartime David Hammack 13. Faith and good works: catholic giving and taking Mary Oates 14. In defence of diversity: Jewish thought from assimilation to cultural pluralism Stephen Whitfield 15. Waging the Cold War in the third world: the foundations and the challenges of development Gary Hess 16. Philanthropy, the civil rights movement, and the politics of racial reform Claude Clegg 17. Philanthropy, the welfare state, and the careers of public and private institutions since 1945 Peter Hall Epilogue: The European Comparison William Cohen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations93
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of SociologySame topicReligion, Society, and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207