MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1528693933 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2015.7178328

Online time-dependent clustering using probabilistic topic models

2015· article· en· W1528693933 on OpenAlexaff
Benjamin Renard, Milad Kharratzadeh, Mark Coates

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCluster analysisProbabilistic logicData miningHierarchical Dirichlet processInferenceData stream miningDirichlet processOverhead (engineering)Component (thermodynamics)AlgorithmMachine learningLatent Dirichlet allocationArtificial intelligenceTopic model

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We introduce an online, time-dependent clustering algorithm that employs a dynamic probabilistic topic model. The proposed algorithm can handle data that evolves over time and strives to capture the evolution of clusters in the dataset. It addresses the case where the entire dataset is not available at once (e.g., the case of data streams) but an up-to-date clustering of the data at any given time is required. One of the main challenges of the data stream setting is that the computational cost and memory overhead must stay bounded as the number of data points increases. Our proposed algorithm has a Dirichlet process-based generative component combined with a sequential Monte Carlo sampler for posterior inference. We also introduce a novel modification to the sampling process, called targeted sampling, which enhances the performance of the SMC sampler. We test the performance of our algorithm with both synthetic and real datasets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.596
Threshold uncertainty score0.428

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBayesian Methods and Mixture ModelsFrench-language works237,207