Floor plate, glia and other support cells in the anterior nerve cord of amphioxus larvae
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Serial electron micrograph reconstructions and interval series were used to examine the support cells, including glia, of the anterior nerve cord in 6‐, 8‐ and 12.5‐day larvae ofBranchiostoma floridaeand one newly metamorphosed juvenile. The floor plate begins immediately behind the infundibular cells. It consists for the most part of a single file of midline cells, but adjacent lateral floor plate cells occur in some places. The floor plate is interrupted at one point, in the posterior part of the cerebral vesicle above the tegmental neuropile. A class of early developing axons crosses the midline at this point, which suggests that the floor plate may have a developmental role in axon guidance. The structural integrity of the cord is maintained by ependymal and ependymoglial cells that attach to its sides. Two other glial cell types were found in larvae. Both appear to originate adjacent to the floor plate and hence are referred to here as midline glia. Those in somites 1 and 2 remain connected to the central canal; they appear to be a mixed population that may include precursors of midline support cells which are present later in the juvenile. Those caudal to somite 3 detach early from the central canal and develop an extensive network of axial processes; they are referred to here as axial glia and treated as a subcategory of midline glia. Based on their site of origin and the absence of glial filaments, their closest counterpart among vertebrate glia may well be the oligodendrocyte. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a possible amphioxus homologue of this important vertebrate cell type.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".