Registro de los cambios del nivel del mar durante el cuaternario en las Islas Canarias Occidentales (Tenerife y La Palma)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depósitos y superficies de erosión asociados a los períodos interglaciares o interestadiales cuaternarios, han sido analizados utilizando cartografías ~eomorfológicas, datos sedimentológicos y paleontológicos. Medidas isotópicas ( 14C y Th/U) y datos de racemización de aminoácidos, a partir de las conchas de los moluscos, han sido utilizados con fines cronológicos. La secuencia marina más completa se desarrolla en la isla de Tenerife, y consiste en cinco terrazas marinas localizadas entre los O y 18 m (por encima del nivel medio del mar); en esta misma isla los depósitos del Ultimo Interglacial (01s 5e) incluyen Strombus bubonius y fauna «senegalesa». Los datos sobre la isla de La Palma son preliminares, aunque dos niveles marinos diferentes pueden ser claramente diferenciados entre las cotas de O y 4 m en la costa noreste de la isla; el más reciente Holoceno y el más antiguo probablemente desarrollado durante el Ultimo Interglacial. Los valores medios de movimientos verticales de los litorales de ambas islas para los últimos 135.000 años, sugieren una ligera tendencia al hundimiento en la isla de Tenerife y un ligero levantamiento en la isla de La Palma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".