MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1528895809 · doi:10.3968/7169

On the New Media to the Challenge for New Young Teachers in Professional Dedication and Countermeasures at Universities

2015· article· en· W1528895809 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jing Ma

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in sociology of science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIdeological and Political Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinese DreamProfessional developmentMedia literacyMeaning (existential)LiteracyDreamPublic relationsNew mediaProduct (mathematics)SociologyPedagogyPsychologyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The new media is the product of media development, which has the characteristics of being massive interactive and personalized. Professional dedication is the component of the Chinese nation in its excellent traditional culture. Under the impact of the new media, the professional dedication of new young teachers in universities in terms of meaning, approaches to achieve an environment where they are involved is being challenged. Therefore, we should strengthen the education of new-literacy and professional education for young teachers, adhere to the combination of online and offline, play the role of gatekeeper, and enhance the management and supervision of new media, thus to raise professional dedication and professional values of new young teachers in universities, and realize the Chinese dream in professional practice activities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0130.017
Scholarly communication0.0110.008
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.203
GPT teacher head0.446
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in sociology of scienceSame topicIdeological and Political EducationFrench-language works237,207