Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to the ratification of the Ottawa Convention, Poland is obliged to dispose of the arsenal of anti-personnel mines. The work on the modernization of the existing mines, which is underway, focuses on the replacement of their fuses with controlled elements, which will soon make it possible to exclude this type of munitions from being defined as anti-personnel mines. The ongoing degradation of currently possessed stockpiles, a ban on production and purchase of this type of munitions as well as cutbacks in funds for purchasing military equipment for the Polish Armed Forces, all mean the necessity of introducing an alternative with the aim of replacing previously used anti-personnel and anti-tank mines – an alternative which will be characterized by economical production process and, at the same time, by effectiveness sufficient to ensure that the minimum quantity thereof will allow the performance of combat tasks at the same, or even higher, level. This paper describes issues connected to the worldwide tendency to eliminate the arsenal of anti-personnel land mines and to replace them with their alternatives, which are to be applied in the protection system of a designated area. The paper defines requirements to be met by an alternative and presents a concept of such a device, constructed on the basis of the design of a warhead that may have installed in it non-lethal weapons’ components.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".