MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1529076775 · doi:10.1109/robot.2003.1241784

Stair descent in the simple hexapod 'RHex'

2004· article· en· W1529076775 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Locomotion and Control
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsHexapodStairsDescent (aeronautics)RobotComputer scienceController (irrigation)SimulationTouchdownControl theory (sociology)Task (project management)Artificial intelligenceEngineeringControl (management)Aerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the first controller that allows our small hexapod robot, RHex, to descend a wide variety of regular sized, "real world" stairs. After selecting one of two sets of trajectories, depending on the slope of the stairs, our open-loop, clock-driven controllers require no further operator input nor task level feedback. Energetics for stair descent is captured via specific resistance values and compared to stair ascent and other behaviors. Even though the algorithms developed and validated in this paper were developed for a particular robot, the basic motion strategies, and the phase relationships between the contralateral leg pairs are likely applicable to other hexapod robots of similar size as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.607
Threshold uncertainty score0.158

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations72
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotic Locomotion and ControlFrench-language works237,207