MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1529158540 · doi:10.1109/icdcs.2015.12

Privacy-Preserving Compressive Sensing for Crowdsensing Based Trajectory Recovery

2015· article· en· W1529158540 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCrowdsensingTrajectoryObfuscationEncryptionHomomorphic encryptionCompressed sensingCloud computingMetric (unit)Interpolation (computer graphics)Property (philosophy)PaddingData miningComputer visionComputer securityAlgorithmImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Location based services have experienced an explosive growth and evolved from utilizing a single location to the whole trajectory. Due to the hardware and energy constraints, there are usually many missing data within a trajectory. In order to accurately recover the complete trajectory, crowdsensing provides a promising method. This method resorts to the correlation among multiple users' trajectories and the advanced compressive sensing technique, which significantly outperforms conventional interpolation methods on accuracy. However, as trajectories exposes users' daily activities, the privacy issue is a major concern in crowdsensing. While existing solutions independently tackle the accurate trajectory recovery and privacy issues, yet no single design is able to address these two challenges simultaneously. Therefore in this paper, we propose a novel Privacy Preserving Compressive Sensing (PPCS) scheme, which encrypts a trajectory with several other trajectories while maintaining the homomorphic obfuscation property for compressive sensing. Under PPCS, adversaries can only capture the encrypted data, so the user privacy is preserved. Furthermore, the homomorphic obfuscation property guarantees that the recovery accuracy of PPCS is comparable to the state-of-the-art compressive sensing design. Based on two publicly available traces with numerous users and long durations, we conduct extensive simulations to evaluate PPCS. The results demonstrate that PPCS achieves a high accuracy of <;53 m and a large distortion between the encrypted and the original trajectories (a commonly adopted metric of privacy strength) of >9,000 m even when up to 50% original data are missing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.877
Threshold uncertainty score0.601

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it