MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1529182086 · doi:10.15210/interfaces.v1i1.6283

A natureza do relacionamento Brasil-Canadá: similaridades, contrastes e a questão ambiental.

2015· article· pt· W1529182086 on OpenAlex
Geraldo Milioli

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2015
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicBrazilian History and Foreign Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidade do Estado de Santa CatarinaNatural Resources CanadaMinistério do Meio AmbienteUniversidade Estadual de CampinasUniversidade Federal de Santa CatarinaGoverno Brasil
KeywordsPolitical sciencePoliticsHumanitiesSociologyPhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O período pós-guerra representa um marco para as transformaçõesocorridas no mundo. No presente, observa-se a necessidade de umaprofundamento das relações e cooperação entre os países, como também dabusca de soluções integradas para problemas de ordem sócio-econômica,política, cultural e ambiental. Nessa dinâmica complexa de um mundo modernoglobalizado e que experimenta um conjunto de desafios, encontram-se Brasil eCanadá. O foco deste artigo é analisar e discutir os interesses comuns eestratégicos dos dois países, apresentar argumentos quanto à desejabilidade dacooperação entre eles, sendo que suas singularidades inerentes favorecem apossibilidade de demonstrar ao mundo um processo de cooperação onde assimilaridades e os contrastes sugerem caminhos à complementaridade.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.952
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it