La régionalisation du social. Une approche de l’étude de cas en sociologie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La sociologie fait face au constat du caractère local des savoirs et des objets qui figurent en tant que médiation de ses travaux empiriques. Cet article propose d'utiliser les referents de la localisation sociale (langage, espace et temps de l'action sociale) afin d'orienter la démarche d'étude de cas. Concevant que les savoirs et les pratiques sociales, dans les sociétés contemporaines, sont localisés plutôt que strictement locaux, l'auteur définit, ï partir de la description du processus d'assimilation et d'accommodation (J. Piaget) dont font état la connaissance et les pratiques sociales, les règles d'une méthode permettant l'identification d'une régionalisation du social. À l'appui de cette démarche, un traitement de l'information en série, recourant à l'informatique qualitative des documents, est proposé pour reconstruire les formes sociales constitutives d'une économie régionalisée.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".