MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1529534950 · doi:10.1177/000842980803700104

L'héritage spirituel d'Etty Hillesum : « Je me sens comme une des nombreuses héritières d'un grand legs spirituel »

2008· article· fr· W1529534950 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicEgo Development and Educational Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Etty Hillesum, une jeune femme juive vivant à Amsterdam, meurt le 30 novembre 1943 à 29 ans, laissant derrière elle des écrits qui suscitent un grand intérêt aujourd'hui. D'une perspective spirituelle, ses écrits posent un problème de lecture : quel est son Dieu ? Peut-on parler de religion chez elle ? Quelles sont ses sources spirituelles ? Ces écrits étonnent par leur caractère éclectique (chrétien, juif, bouddhiste, taoïste) et soulèvent plusieurs questions. Après avoir présenté Etty dans son contexte, nous nous proposons dans cet article d'aborder la question de l'identité, préalable essentiel à un cheminement humain et spirituel équilibré. Etty se sent appelée à transmettre son héritage spirituel afin de préparer les temps nouveaux. Mais existe-t-il des paroles assez puissantes pour rendre son témoignage crédible ? Peut-on parler de Dieu lorsque la violence et la haine se déchaînent sur des innocents ?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.014
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.257
GPT teacher head0.446
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it