A Broken Intracavernous Needle: Successful Ultrasound-Guided Removal
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Common complications of intracavernous injection therapy include pain, hematoma formation, syncope, prolonged erections, and penile fibrosis. Rare reported complications include postinjection cavernositis, intracorporeal needle breakage. AIM: We report a case of postinjection intracavernous needle breakage with successful ultrasound-guided retrieval. METHODS: A 32-year-old patient complaining of a 6-month penile pain following intracavernous papaverine injection presented to our department. Clinical examination and penile ultrasound revealed a broken intracavernous needle at the left mid-dorsum aspect of the penis with surrounding fibrosis. A decision was made to remove the broken needle. RESULTS: The needle was dislodged effortlessly under local anesthesia. CONCLUSION: A deeply seated intracavernous broken needle should be immediately retrieved. Patients must be carefully instructed on the proper injection technique with emphasis on the delicacy of the needle and the possibility of needle breakage during injection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it