Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article interroge la condition de nos usages partagés de la catégorie musicale Musique du monde. En étudiant de manière analytique son implication dans les activités de deux grandes enseignes de la distribution de disques, la FNAC et le Virgin Megastore, nous glisserons d’un questionnement relatif à la classification d’un ensemble de disques proposés à la vente à un questionnement concernant l’implication de catégories musicales dans la production et l’expression de nos façons de vivre la musique. Plus précisément, cet article s’attache à l’occurrence et à l’usage de la catégorie Musique du monde au sein des rayons des magasins bordelais de ces enseignes. Ces rayonnages sont étudiés comme des espaces de mise en scène de la diversité musicale. L’examen de leur organisation nous conduira à problématiser l’objet de ce classement de disques et les conditions de son appropriation, pour engager en conclusion une réflexion sur l’expression et la connaissance de nos « goûts musicaux ».
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".