MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1530024599

In the Renaissance

2010· book· en· W1530024599 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Linda Kalof, W. F. Bynum

Bibliographic record

VenueBloomsbury eBooks · 2010
Typebook
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHistorical Economic and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe RenaissanceArt historyRenaissance literatureBeautyArtEarly modern EuropeClassicsHistory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Illustrations Series Preface Introduction William Bynum, University College London, UK 1 Birth and Death in Early Modern Europe Lianne McTavish, University of Alberta, Canada 2 Why Me? Why Now? How? The Body in Health and Disease Margaret Healy, University of Sussex, UK 3 Sexuality: Of Man, Woman, and Beastly Business Katherine Crawford, Vanderbilt University, USA 4 The Body in /as Text: Medical Knowledge and Technologies in the Renaissance Susan Broomhall, University of Western Australia, Australia 5 The Common Body: Renaissance Popular Beliefs Karen Raber, University of Mississippi, USA 6 Beauty and Concepts of the Ideal Mary Rogers, independent scholar 7 The Marked Body as Otherness in Renaissance Italian Culture Patrizia Bettella, University of Alberta, Canada 8 The Marked Body: The Witches, Lady Macbeth, and the Relics Diane Purkiss, University of Oxford, UK 9 Fashioning Civil Bodies and Others: Cultural Representations Margaret Healy, University of Sussex, UK 10 Renaissance Selves, Renaissance Bodies Margaret L. King, City University of New York, USA Notes Bibliography Contributors Index

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.182

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0540.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloomsbury eBooksSame topicHistorical Economic and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207