MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1530079397 · doi:10.1159/000106818

Possible Non-Mendelian Mechanisms of Thyroid Dysgenesis

2007· review· en· W1530079397 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEndocrine development · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Syndromes and Imprinting
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineUniversité de Montréal
FundersEndocrine Fellows Foundation
KeywordsThyroidDysgenesisMendelian inheritanceAgenesisHypoplasiaEctopic thyroidPAX8MedicineBiologyBioinformaticsPathologyGeneticsInternal medicineGeneTranscription factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most research on the molecular mechanisms of thyroid dysgenesis over the past decade has focussed on the Mendelian mechanisms that may account for the few (5%) cases in which there is an affected relative. This chapter first reviews methodological issues in the imaging techniques used to classify thyroid dysgenesis into its various forms (ectopic thyroid, agenesis, orthotopic hypoplasia and hemiagenesis). It then reviews the evidence that non-Mendelian mechanisms must be involved in the vast majority of cases of this disease, for which the percentage of sporadic cases and of discordance between monozygotic twins exceeds 95%. Among the mechanisms reviewed are early somatic mutations and epigenetic changes in genes involved in thyroid development such as the thyroid transcription factors TTF-1, TTF-2 and PAX-8. The possible role of extrathyroid genes involved in the control of migration of the median thyroid bud during embryogenesis, such as adhesion molecules, and of vascular factors involved in the stabilization of the bilobed structure of the thyroid is also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it