Bibliographic record
Abstract
diary" for many Amish communities.One thinks of a slower-paced blog or wiki.The Budget began in 1890 and was used historically by a range of Amish and Mennonite groups; Die Botschaft was founded in 1976 to address a more restricted Old Order audience.Nolt's chapter is followed by Karen Johnson-Weiner's chapter on Amish publishing houses, which were started to meet a demand for Amish school textbooks.Gordonville, Pennsylvania, reprints standard textbooks, such as the McGuffey Readers, while Pathway Publishers (Aylmer, Ontario, and LaGrange, Indiana) produces original literature that is selfconsciously Old Order.Amish people communicate with one another in many ways with little dependence on mass media to do it for them.The Amish and the Media does well in tracing the current state of media treatment of Amish communities and the ways the Amish shape their own modes of communication.Reaching back further in time would strengthen the collection; the complex relationship of media and Amish did not begin with Witness.For this task, there is David Weaver-Zercher's The Amish in the American Imagination (2001) and David Walbert's Garden Spot: Lancaster County, the Old Order Amish, and the Selling of Rural America (2002).In any event, the book under review will prepare readers for the next Amish media feeding frenzy, whatever it turns out to be.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.214 | 0.070 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".