MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1530208037 · doi:10.7202/014704ar

Une Pentecôte pour Judas

2007· article· fr· W1530208037 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Thierry Bissonnette

Bibliographic record

VenueVoix et Images · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyMartyrArtTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tributaire d’une esthétique misant sur l’inspiration et la singularité, l’oeuvre de Denis Vanier valorise la transgression tout en réactivant des schèmes appartenant au sacré. Si les images du martyr et de la rédemption y sont présentes, la construction d’une figure du poète à la fois occulte, christique et prométhéenne s’assortit d’une résistance au religieux. Il s’agit dans cet article d’éclairer la référence au mythe de la Pentecôte, présente dans le surnom « Langue de feu » décerné à l’auteur, ainsi qu’à travers maints renvois à l’ignition et au christianisme. Baptême de feu, voire immolation, cette écriture oscille entre la transfiguration du corps et sa destruction violente, ce qui est ici détaillé à partir de plusieurs extraits des recueils.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.245
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVoix et ImagesSame topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207