MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1530308516 · doi:10.1093/ml/gcr030

Re-reading Poetry: Schubert's Multiple Settings of Goethe. By Sterling Lambert.

2011· article· en· W1530308516 on OpenAlexaffabout
Doris Schroeder

Bibliographic record

VenueMusic and Letters · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFolklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryReading (process)LiteratureArtArt historyPhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal Article Re-reading Poetry: Schubert's Multiple Settings of Goethe. By Sterling Lambert. Get access Re-reading Poetry: Schubert's Multiple Settings of Goethe. By Sterling Lambert. pp. ix + 274. ( The Boydell Press, Woodbridge, 2009, £55. ISBN 978-1-84383-474-8.) David Schroeder David Schroeder Dalhousie University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Music and Letters, Volume 92, Issue 3, August 2011, Pages 488–489, https://doi.org/10.1093/ml/gcr030 Published: 20 July 2011

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.610
Threshold uncertainty score0.544

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMusic and LettersSame topicFolklore, Mythology, and Literature StudiesFrench-language works237,207