MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1530319446 · doi:10.1109/pimrc.2004.1368282

Joint timing and pilot symbol channel estimation for diversity receivers in Rayleigh fading channels

2005· article· en· W1530319446 on OpenAlexaff
Pawel A. Dmochowski, P.J. McLane

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFadingChannel (broadcasting)Rayleigh fadingComputer scienceBandwidth (computing)Bit error rateAlgorithmElectronic engineeringControl theory (sociology)TelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An effective method for joint timing and channel estimation for receive diversity systems in a frequency-flat Rayleigh fading environment is presented. We implement nonsynchronous timing recovery using Gardner's timing error detector, whose insensitivity to phase errors allows for timing recovery prior to pilot symbol based channel estimation. By employing a polyphase filter bank in the timing loop, we are able to simultaneously carry out matched filtering and data interpolation, thus eliminating the need for a separate interpolation filter. In addition, selection diversity combining is used to select the input to the timing loop, thus improving the reliability of the signal used for timing recovery. Pilot assisted channel estimation is performed on the recovered data strobes. For normalized Doppler frequency of 0.01 the system's bit error rate (BER) performance is within 1 dB from the ideal timing and channel estimation error bound, with an additional drop of 1.5 dB for a nonoptimum channel interpolator. In deep fades, the receiver timing is held fixed. We show that the receiver maintains timing lock over such fades up to a normalized timing bandwidth of 1/spl times/10/sup -4/for normalized Doppler frequency up to 0.05.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207