Stratégies de migration et d’accès au marché du travail des professionnelles roumaines à Toronto
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La mobilité accrue des spécialistes et la féminisation grandissante des flux migratoires sont deux traits incontournables des transformations manifestes de nos jours dans le champ des migrations internationales. Cependant, seulement peu d’attention a été accordée aux femmes migrantes dans les études des « skilled migrations ».À partir des résultats d’une recherche en cours focalisée sur les stratégies de reproduction des capitaux des professionnels roumains en situation migratoire, nous analysons dans cet article, à travers une approche de sociologie qualitative, plusieurs dimensions des trajectoires des migrantes roumaines au Canada : l’impact du statut d’entrée sur leur habilité d’intégration, les stratégies différées que les professionnelles roumaines développent afin de contourner les barrières structurelles qui limitent l’accès au marché du travail canadien, l’influence de la migration sur les modèles familiaux et la recomposition des rapports de genre qui en découle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".