Controls on Terrestrial Evapotranspiration from a Forest-Wetland Complex in the Western Boreal Plain, Alberta, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Western Boreal Plain (WBP) of North Central Alberta consists of a mosaic wetlands and aspen (Populus tremuloides) dominated uplands. This region operates within a moisture deficit regime where precipitation (P) and evapotranspiration (ET) are the dominant hydrologic fluxes. As such these systems are extremely susceptible to the slightest to the slightest climatic variability that may upset the balance between P and ET. Vegetation composition is the dominant control on wetland ET, and itself is extremely dynamic within these wetland environments, which can be attributed to varying moisture regimes along with micrometeorological variations. To address this variability in moisture regimes ET was examined in a typical moraine wetland of the WBP during the 2005 and 2006 snow-free seasons. Closed dynamic chamber measurements were used to gather data on plant community scale actual evapotranspiration (ET) for an undisturbed natural bog with varying degrees of canopy cover surrounding a shallow groundwater fed pond. For the purposes of scaling plant community ET contributions to that of the wetland, potential ET (PETEQ) was measured using a Priestley-Taylor energy balance approach at three separate wetland sites with varying aspects surrounding the central pond, along with actual ET using a roving eddy covariance (EC) tower. Growing season peak ET rates ranged from 0.2 mm hr-1 to 0.6 mm hr-1 depending on location, vegetation composition and time period. Sphagnum contributions were the greatest early in the growing season reaching peaks of 0.6 mm hr-1, while lichen sites exhibited the greatest late season rates at 0.4 mm hr-1. Thus, Sphagnum and other non-vascular wetland plant species control ET differently throughout the growing season and as such should be considered an integral part of the moisture and water balances within wetland environments at the sub-landcover unit scale.\nUpland ET was characterized over three scales during the 2005 and 2006 snowfree seasons. Above canopy (ETC) and within canopy (ETB) were examined using the EC technique situated at 25.5 m (7.5 m above crown) and 4.0 m above the ground surface respectively. Soil evaporation (ES) was examined using a closed dynamic chamber system to gather data on surface evaporation for upland soils. ETc and ETB were controlled primarily through atmospheric demand (VPD) while Es was controlled by soil moisture (9). During the green periods ETC averaged 3.08 mm d-1 and 3.45 mm d-1 in 2005 and 2006 respectively while ETB averaged 1.56 mm d-1 and 1.95 mm d-1. Es was consistent across both snow-free seasons and averaged 0.28 mm hr-1 in 2005 and 0.31 mm hr-1 in 2006. The nature of Populus tremuloides canopies permits ample energy availability within the canopy during the early season early green periods which promotes the development of a lush understory consisting of Rosa acicularis and Viburnum edule. ETB fluxes were equal to or greater than the ETC fluxes once understory development had occurred. Upon crown growth ETB fluxes were reduced as a reduction in available energy existed. ETB fluxes ranged from 42 to 56% of ETC fluxes over the remainder of the snowfree seasons. Vapour pressure deficit (VPD) and soil moisture (0) displayed strong controls on both ETc and ETB fluxes. ETc fluxes responded to precipitation events as the developed crown intercepted and held available water which contributed to peak ETC fluxes following precipitation events >10 mm. This indicates the importance of interception in aspen dominated forest canopies of the WBF.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".