MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1530544172 · doi:10.7202/039275ar

Sous l’affaire de la burqa... quel visage de la laïcité française ?1

2010· article· fr· W1530544172 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueSociologie et sociétés · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans cet article, nous proposons une analyse sociologique du moment juridique de mise en oeuvre de la régulation de la diversité religieuse qu’a constitué la décision du Conseil d’État du 27 juin 2008 refusant la nationalité française à une ressortissante marocaine qui portait la burqa . Nous entendons démontrer l’hypothèse selon laquelle cette décision s’inscrit dans un raidissement de la « laïcité narrative », un raidissement préalablement conforté par l’adoption du rapport de la Commission Stasi en 2003 puis par le vote de la loi du 15 mars 2004 relative au port de signes manifestant ostensiblement une appartenance religieuse dans les écoles, collèges et lycées publics. Nous montrons qu’harmonisant ainsi « laïcité narrative » et « laïcité juridique », cette décision du Conseil d’État a constitué un point d’ancrage solide au développement d’une rhétorique républicaine sur l’aménagement du religieux, alimentant en retour la « laïcité narrative ».

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.433
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.009
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.266
GPT teacher head0.545
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it