La diversité culturelle telle que racontée par les manuels scolaires d’histoire du Québec et du Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quelle est la vision de la diversité culturelle proposée par les manuels scolaires d’histoire? Telle est la question que se posent les auteures. Elles utilisent comme sources les manuels en usage en quatrième secondaire dans les écoles québécoises durant les années 1980 et 1990. L’étude s’appuie sur le concept de « complexe discursif » pour soutenir que le sens ne se présente pas comme une donnée stable et constante, mais qu’il est plutôt soumis au changement et qu’il évolue à l’intérieur de réseaux discursifs. Les auteures concluent que le récit scolaire historique fait une place de choix à la diversité culturelle sans pourtant parvenir à inclure les autochtones et les minorités culturelles dans la trame narrative.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".