MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1530732033 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2015.7129158

A proposed operating plant risk profile to improve the system performance

2015· article· en· W1530732033 on OpenAlexaff
Harmanveer Cheema, Manpreet Sidhu, Shoaib Qabil, Hamed H. Aly, Rob MacNeil

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicRisk and Safety Analysis
Canadian institutionsNova Scotia Department of EnergyAcadia UniversityDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTroubleshootingScheme (mathematics)Reliability engineeringRisk assessmentComputer scienceRisk analysis (engineering)Power stationEngineeringElectrical engineeringComputer securityBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Risk profile of a working plant is one of the most important topics these days. The risk profile of plant/ equipment is a kind of new method and different approach for planning and troubleshooting in the electric power industry. This paper discusses this new method of risk assessment of equipment operation in the working plants, the whole procedure is designed, developed and implemented for the equipment risk assessment, and the use of each part in the scheme is described in detail. Then, the several recommendations are proposed to increase the effectiveness of the scheme, and the scheme of the plant equipment risk assessment is summarized, the advantages and disadvantages of the scheme are explained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRisk and Safety AnalysisFrench-language works237,207