MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1530742573 · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.174.6.3153

Cutting Edge: Signaling Lymphocytic Activation Molecule-Associated Protein Controls NKT Cell Functions

2005· article· en· W1530742573 on OpenAlexaff
Brian K. Chung, Ala Aoukaty, Jan Dutz, Cox Terhorst, Rusung Tan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Cell Function and Interaction
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNatural killer T cellBiologyImmune systemImmunologyKnockout mouseGene knockoutCell biologyCD1DT cellMolecular biologyReceptorGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

X-linked lymphoproliferative disease (XLP) is a fatal immunological disorder that typically manifests following EBV infection. XLP patients exhibit a number of immune defects including abnormal T, B, and NK lymphocyte function. These defects have been attributed to mutations of Src homology 2 domain-containing gene 1A (SH2D1A), the gene encoding signaling lymphocytic activation molecule-associated protein (SAP), an intracellular adaptor molecule expressed in lymphocytes. We have observed that SAP knockout (SAPKO) mice and humans with XLP have a complete lack of CD1d-restricted NKT cells. As expected, SAPKO mice injected with the NKT cell agonist, alpha-galactosylceramide failed to generate NKT cell IFN-gamma or IL-4. Furthermore, in contrast to wild-type littermates, SAPKO mice coinjected with OVA and alpha-galactosylceramide failed to mount OVA-specific CTL responses. These data suggest that an absence of NKT cells may underlie part of the immune dysregulation seen in SAPKO mice and in XLP patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations169
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicImmune Cell Function and InteractionFrench-language works237,207