Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les Innus qui souhaitent encore apprendre et transmettre la culture traditionnelle ont aujourd’hui recours à de nouvelles stratégies : écriture, documentaires, stages en forêt, cours scolaires, musées et centres culturels, sites Web et outils multimédias. Il s’agit d’arriver à composer avec les profondes transformations produites par la colonisation et par le mode de vie contemporain : la sédentarisation en réserve, les nouvelles pratiques économiques, la scolarisation des jeunes. Un rôle dramatique semble avoir été joué notamment par l’institution des écoles résidentielles catholiques, dans les années 1950. Selon plusieurs Innus, elles auraient coupé les racines culturelles des nouvelles générations. Dans la situation de crise qui en résulte, la tradition se perpétue à travers des actions novatrices, créatives et conscientes. Basé sur une recherche de terrain de plus de deux ans (2003-2006) dans la communauté innue de Uashat mak Maniutenam (Côte-Nord du Québec), cet article analyse les transformations du processus de transmission du « savoir innu » à partir d’une conception dynamique de la « tradition ».
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.072 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".