Connaissance de la morphologie dérivationnelle chez les francophones et non-francophones de 6 à 8 ans
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This study focuses on the awareness of derivational morphology by first- and second-grade Francophone and Allophone students. Three tests of morphological awareness which targeted four aspects of this competency (receptive, relational, syntactic, and distributional) were administered to 41 children of the same school, half of whom spoke French at home and half of whom spoke another language. Results compiled for the three tests showed that the two groups differed significantly. With respect to the various test subcomponents, scores for Non-francophones tended to be generally lower than those for Francophones. Of note, however, is the fact that although differences for the receptive and distributional aspects were significant, such was not the case for the relational and syntactic aspects. It was thus concluded that by first grade the morphological awareness skills of all children, including Non-francophones with limited exposure to French, were sufficiently developed to serve as a resource for the teaching of vocabulary.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.029 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.041 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it